Slow Progress
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2c78/e2c78dcc88fc1f65b9c6293553a1736d5c70f15e" alt="P1090729a"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7653/c7653e912265dad00c93b3adf400bafc4516e115" alt="Typecast042"
(1) Link
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69557/69557df96041b8c4225dcddfeb3ae5f475b72faf" alt="P1090730a"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9a91/c9a917431c9380b77bf3d826b18b38b3645029bf" alt="Typecast043"
Post-Script: Double points get assigned to whomever can identify the source of the artwork on focus at the view screen shown in the second photo. I was using the binocular lens on the front of the box, shown in the top photo.
Here's a photo of the red-LED circuit, with plastic diffuser. As you can see, the interior of the box in the background (not yet painted black) is nicely illuminated:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c58b/2c58b82a055d9ffce8e482efc58094c868f94291" alt="P1090731a"
I thought, for the sake of completeness and those darkroom photo nerds out there, I'd post results of my red light + photo paper fog tests.
Starting in the upper left corner going clockwise:
Red RubyLith window + Red 25A eyepiece filter both opened, 2 minutes exposure (intense fogging);
With eyepiece closed, 2 minutes exposure (still intense fogging from RubyLith film);
Red 25A eyepiece filter open, RubyLith window closed, 2 minutes exposure (still intense fogging);
With eyepiece closed and RubyLith window stopped down to 1/4" hole, 20 seconds exposure (still slight fogging);
5-watt red-LED directly above paper, 2 minutes exposure (slight fogging);
5-watt red-LED filtered through plastic diffuser, 2 minutes exposure (NO FOGGING-YAY!!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48ef1/48ef1c7aa3c10377c793f571f4cbf7ecf2fbb61f" alt="P1090732a"
Typecast via Smith-Corona Silent; photos via Lumix G5.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home