Slow Progress
![P1090729a](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8639/15987027293_68b353d097_o.jpg)
![Typecast042](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8657/15984632454_3185e1e762_o.jpg)
(1) Link
![P1090730a](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8596/15987026863_31c55069c6_o.jpg)
![Typecast043](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8569/16419611898_64780f6db3_o.jpg)
Post-Script: Double points get assigned to whomever can identify the source of the artwork on focus at the view screen shown in the second photo. I was using the binocular lens on the front of the box, shown in the top photo.
Here's a photo of the red-LED circuit, with plastic diffuser. As you can see, the interior of the box in the background (not yet painted black) is nicely illuminated:
![P1090731a](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8679/16605630821_fb28a56f3d_o.jpg)
I thought, for the sake of completeness and those darkroom photo nerds out there, I'd post results of my red light + photo paper fog tests.
Starting in the upper left corner going clockwise:
Red RubyLith window + Red 25A eyepiece filter both opened, 2 minutes exposure (intense fogging);
With eyepiece closed, 2 minutes exposure (still intense fogging from RubyLith film);
Red 25A eyepiece filter open, RubyLith window closed, 2 minutes exposure (still intense fogging);
With eyepiece closed and RubyLith window stopped down to 1/4" hole, 20 seconds exposure (still slight fogging);
5-watt red-LED directly above paper, 2 minutes exposure (slight fogging);
5-watt red-LED filtered through plastic diffuser, 2 minutes exposure (NO FOGGING-YAY!!)
![P1090732a](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8636/16606169252_a63e5bf6aa_o.jpg)
Typecast via Smith-Corona Silent; photos via Lumix G5.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home